{"id":1001,"date":"2026-06-01T20:58:40","date_gmt":"2026-06-01T20:58:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/?p=1001"},"modified":"2026-06-01T23:46:27","modified_gmt":"2026-06-01T23:46:27","slug":"ai-keyword-research-tool","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/ai-keyword-research-tool\/","title":{"rendered":"AI Keyword Research Tool: What Actually Changed (and What Did Not) in 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div>\n<p><strong>Quick answer:<\/strong> AI keyword research in 2026 covers three layers traditional tools mostly miss: conversational query patterns (how people phrase questions to <a href=\"https:\/\/chat.openai.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ChatGPT<\/a> differently than to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google<\/a>), AI engine citation queries (which queries trigger <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.google\/products\/search\/generative-ai-google-search-may-2024\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">AI Overview<\/a> or ChatGPT recommendations), and intent depth beyond search volume (commercial vs informational vs comparative intent driving actual conversion). Traditional tools like <a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ahrefs<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.semrush.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">SEMrush<\/a> still win on raw keyword database size; AI-native tools win on layers traditional tools were not built to cover.<\/p>\n<p><strong>TL;DR<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>AI keyword research adds three layers traditional tools miss: conversational queries, AI citation queries, deeper intent.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Ahrefs and SEMrush still lead for raw keyword database depth \u2014 pair them with AI-native tools.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Linkstonic SearchMind handles AI engine citation tracking across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Conversational query patterns differ from typed Google queries in length, phrasing, and context depth.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Most teams over-research and under-execute \u2014 30 well-tracked keywords beat 500 unattended ones.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Most \u201cAI keyword research tool\u201d descriptions in 2026 are traditional keyword tools with ChatGPT bolted on for content suggestions. That is not really AI keyword research. That is keyword research that uses AI to write articles after the fact. The actual shift in keyword research happens earlier: at the query discovery and intent classification stage, where AI search has changed how people search.<\/p>\n<p>Below is what AI keyword research actually means in 2026, how it differs from the traditional approach, and which tools handle which layer well.<\/p>\n<p>[INSERT REAL STAT: cite a 2025-2026 study on the divergence between Google typed-query volume and AI engine conversational-query volume for the same intent (Datos.live, Profound, BrightEdge, or SparkToro research), with link to source]. According to <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2024\/03\/core-update-spam-policies\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google\u2019s published guidance on conversational search<\/a>, the structural shift in how users phrase questions to AI engines has measurable downstream effects on what keyword research actually needs to cover.<\/p>\n<p>[INSERT REAL QUOTE: from Tim Soulo (Ahrefs CMO), Patrick Stox (Ahrefs), or Aleyda Solis on how AI keyword research workflows have shifted in 2025-2026. Confirm wording and link to original post\/podcast\/talk.]<\/p>\n<h2>What changed about keyword research in 2026?<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Conversational queries replaced fragment queries in many categories.<\/strong> In 2018, a buyer typed \u201cbest CRM small business\u201d into Google. In 2026, the same buyer asks ChatGPT \u201cwhat is the best CRM for a 10-person consulting firm that needs to track project hours and integrate with QuickBooks?\u201d The query has expanded from 3 words to 25 words and contains specific intent context that traditional keyword tools cannot surface because they track shorter Google queries.<\/p>\n<p><strong>AI engine queries are tracked separately from Google.<\/strong> A query that gets 500 monthly searches in Google might get 2,000 monthly conversations in ChatGPT for the same buyer intent. Or vice versa. Tracking only Google volume undercounts (or overcounts) total demand significantly.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Intent classification has become more important than volume.<\/strong> A high-volume informational query (500k\/month) might convert at 0.1%. A low-volume commercial query (200\/month) might convert at 8%. The high-volume query produces more clicks; the low-volume query produces more revenue. AI engines emphasize this difference because they answer informational queries directly without clicks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>AI Overview triggering queries are a new category.<\/strong> Some Google queries trigger AI Overview boxes that answer the question directly. These queries lose 30-60% of click-through to traditional rankings. Other queries do not trigger AI Overview and maintain full click-through. Tools that surface which queries are AI-Overview-affected give actionable information traditional tools do not.<\/p>\n<h2>What should an AI keyword research tool actually do?<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Discover conversational query patterns.<\/strong> Surface how people ask questions to AI engines (longer, more contextual, often with specific constraints) versus how they search Google (shorter, often fragment-based).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Track AI engine query volume separately.<\/strong> Estimate how many times specific queries appear in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity conversations versus Google search.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Classify queries by intent and AI-affect status.<\/strong> Tag each query as informational, commercial, navigational, or transactional. Also tag whether the query triggers AI Overviews in Google and what percentage of click-through is lost to AI answers.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Surface related questions buyers actually ask.<\/strong> Beyond keyword variations, surface the longer questions buyers actually ask AI engines for the same underlying need.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Connect queries to AI citation opportunity.<\/strong> Show which queries currently get AI answers that cite competitors, indicating where citation-focused content could displace incumbent answers.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Provide traditional metrics for reference.<\/strong> Search volume, keyword difficulty, CPC, SERP features. The traditional layer still matters; AI tools should add to it rather than replace it.<\/p>\n<h2>How does Linkstonic SearchMind handle AI keyword research?<\/h2>\n<p>SearchMind is Linkstonic\u2019s keyword research module. Direct framing: SearchMind is not designed to compete with Ahrefs\u2019 32 trillion-keyword database or SEMrush\u2019s 24 billion keyword index on raw database size. Those tools win on volume and remain better for pure database depth. SearchMind is designed for the AI-search-affected layer that traditional databases were not built to cover.<\/p>\n<h3>AI Keyword Explorer<\/h3>\n<p>Surfaces keyword opportunities based on how AI engines phrase queries in your category, not just how Google searchers phrase them. Useful for finding the longer-tail conversational queries that traditional databases miss because the queries are too rare on Google but common in ChatGPT and Perplexity conversations.<\/p>\n<h3>SERP AI Tracker<\/h3>\n<p>Tracks which of your tracked keywords trigger AI Overviews in Google and which do not. Surfaces the click-through impact estimate for each AI-Overview-affected keyword. Useful for prioritizing content that is still recoverable versus content where AI Overviews have permanently reduced click-through.<\/p>\n<h3>Related Questions<\/h3>\n<p>Surfaces the longer, conversational questions buyers ask AI engines around your tracked keywords. Useful for building FAQ schema content that lifts citation likelihood and for understanding the broader query space around each core keyword.<\/p>\n<h3>LLM Brand Monitor<\/h3>\n<p>Tracks how often your brand appears in AI engine responses for your tracked keywords. Useful for measuring brand visibility in the AI search layer specifically (separate from traditional Google ranking).<\/p>\n<h3>AI Prompt Ideas<\/h3>\n<p>Suggests specific AI engine queries to track based on your category and competitors. Useful when starting AI visibility tracking from scratch and uncertain which queries matter most in your category.<\/p>\n<h2>Traditional vs AI keyword research: how do the workflows compare?<\/h2>\n<p>The two workflows differ in cadence, output, and decision support.<\/p>\n<h3>Traditional keyword research (Ahrefs, SEMrush, Moz)<\/h3>\n<p>Start with a seed keyword. Expand to 500-5,000 related keywords. Filter by volume, difficulty, intent (loosely). Pick 50-100 to track. Output: a keyword list with monthly volume estimates and difficulty scores. Decision support: which keywords have favorable volume-to-difficulty ratios.<\/p>\n<h3>AI keyword research (Linkstonic SearchMind, similar tools)<\/h3>\n<p>Start with a topic area. Surface how AI engines phrase queries in that topic area. Identify which queries trigger AI Overviews and which do not. Map queries to your existing content. Surface gaps and citation opportunities. Pick 30-100 queries to track across both Google and AI engines. Output: a query list with AI affect status, citation opportunity, and traditional metrics for reference. Decision support: which queries have recoverable click-through, which need citation-focused content, which warrant traditional ranking-focused content.<\/p>\n<p>The traditional workflow produces a keyword list. The AI workflow produces a content strategy. Both have value at different points in the SEO program.<\/p>\n<h2>What does a real workflow combining both approaches look like?<\/h2>\n<p>Here is how most sophisticated SEO teams approach keyword research in 2026.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 1 (traditional):<\/strong> Use Ahrefs, SEMrush, or a similar database tool to surface raw keyword opportunities in your category. Expand the seed list to 500-2,000 candidate keywords.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 2 (AI-augmented):<\/strong> Filter candidates through SearchMind or similar AI-aware tool. Tag each keyword for AI Overview triggering, AI engine query volume, and conversational query equivalents. Drop keywords where AI Overviews have permanently reduced click-through to under 20%.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 3 (intent-driven):<\/strong> Classify remaining keywords by commercial intent. Prioritize commercial-intent queries (comparison queries, decision queries, alternative queries) over high-volume informational queries.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 4 (gap-aware):<\/strong> For each priority keyword, check whether AI engines currently cite competitors for the query. Queries with weak existing AI citations are opportunities where new high-quality content can earn citation faster than queries with strong incumbent citations.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 5 (tracked):<\/strong> Add the final 50-100 keywords to tracking across both Google and AI engines. Review weekly. Adjust priorities based on actual performance after 4-8 weeks.<\/p>\n<p>Total time for the full workflow: 4-6 hours for an established site, 8-12 hours for a new site building keyword strategy from scratch. Most teams do this quarterly rather than weekly.<\/p>\n<h2>What is Linkstonic SearchMind NOT good for?<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Raw keyword database depth.<\/strong> Ahrefs and SEMrush have significantly larger keyword databases. For SEO teams whose work depends on finding obscure long-tail keywords in vast indices, those tools remain better. SearchMind covers the AI search layer that those tools miss but does not replace deep database research.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Historical search volume data going back years.<\/strong> Larger database tools have 5-10 years of historical search volume data. SearchMind has shorter historical coverage as a newer platform. For trend analysis going back multiple years, traditional tools win.<\/p>\n<p><strong>PPC keyword research.<\/strong> CPC estimates and PPC competitive analysis are not SearchMind\u2019s focus. SEMrush specifically has stronger PPC keyword data. For teams running paid search alongside SEO, pair SearchMind with a PPC-focused tool.<\/p>\n<h2>What does AI keyword research cost?<\/h2>\n<p>Linkstonic SearchMind is included in all paid tiers.<\/p>\n<p>Starter tier at $0\/month: 10 tracked keywords across 2 AI engines plus Google. Basic SearchMind access. Useful for testing the workflow.<\/p>\n<p>Pro tier at $49\/month: 100 tracked keywords across all 4 AI engines plus Google. Full SearchMind including AI Keyword Explorer, SERP AI Tracker, Related Questions, LLM Brand Monitor, AI Prompt Ideas. GSC sync.<\/p>\n<p>Agency tier at $149\/month: Unlimited tracked keywords. All SearchMind features. Multi-brand support. N8n webhook API for custom workflows.<\/p>\n<p>Compare to: Ahrefs Lite $129\/month with 750 tracked keywords on a much larger keyword database, no native AI engine tracking. SEMrush Pro $139.95\/month with 500 tracked keywords plus $99\/month AI Toolkit add-on for AI features. The cost comparison depends on whether AI engine tracking matters for your category.<\/p>\n<h2>Quick voice-search answers<\/h2>\n<p><strong>What is an AI keyword research tool?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>An AI keyword research tool surfaces three things traditional keyword tools miss: conversational queries people ask ChatGPT and Claude differently than they type into Google, queries that trigger AI Overviews or ChatGPT recommendations rather than traditional results, and deeper intent classification beyond search volume. Examples include Linkstonic SearchMind, Keyword Insights, and AI-augmented features in Ahrefs and SEMrush.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Do I need an AI keyword research tool if I already use Ahrefs?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yes for AI search work specifically. Ahrefs still leads for raw keyword database depth and traditional Google rank tracking. Ahrefs does not natively track AI engine citation queries or conversational query patterns the way AI-native tools do. The right pattern combines a traditional tool (Ahrefs, SEMrush) with an AI-native tool (Linkstonic, Otterly) \u2014 both work together rather than as alternatives.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Are conversational queries different from typed Google queries?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yes, in three ways. Conversational queries to ChatGPT are typically longer (8 to 15 words versus 3 to 5 typed words), include more context (\u201cfor a 5-person team\u201d or \u201cunder 100 dollars\u201d), and use natural sentence phrasing rather than keyword shorthand. Traditional keyword tools surface the typed version; AI-native tools surface both versions because each requires different optimization.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How many keywords should I actually track?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Track 30 to 100 high-priority keywords carefully rather than 500 or 1,000 carelessly. Most teams discover 500 keywords during research and act on 10 to 20 of them in execution. Quality of tracking beats quantity. Concentrate on commercial-intent keywords with real business impact rather than broad informational keywords where AI Overview now captures most of the value.<\/p>\n<div class=\"faq-accordion\">\n<h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<details class=\"faq-item\" style=\"border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:8px;margin:0 0 12px;padding:16px 20px;background:#fff;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:600;cursor:pointer;list-style:none;font-size:1.05em;\">Is AI keyword research replacing traditional keyword research?<\/summary>\n<div style=\"margin-top:12px;line-height:1.7;color:#374151;\">\n<p>No, augmenting it. The traditional layer (raw keyword discovery, search volume estimation, difficulty scoring) still matters. The AI layer (conversational queries, AI engine tracking, AI Overview affect status) adds to it. Most sophisticated SEO teams in 2026 use both layers, with the AI layer becoming more important as AI search drives more discovery.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details class=\"faq-item\" style=\"border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:8px;margin:0 0 12px;padding:16px 20px;background:#fff;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:600;cursor:pointer;list-style:none;font-size:1.05em;\">Can I do AI keyword research with just ChatGPT instead of a paid tool?<\/summary>\n<div style=\"margin-top:12px;line-height:1.7;color:#374151;\">\n<p>For early-stage solo operations, yes. Ask ChatGPT \u201cwhat queries do people typically ask when researching [topic]?\u201d and \u201cwhat longer questions do buyers ask before purchasing [product category]?\u201d to surface conversational query patterns. This handles the qualitative layer. For systematic tracking, AI affect status, and competitive analysis, a dedicated tool becomes necessary as the site grows.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details class=\"faq-item\" style=\"border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:8px;margin:0 0 12px;padding:16px 20px;background:#fff;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:600;cursor:pointer;list-style:none;font-size:1.05em;\">How does SearchMind compare to Ahrefs or SEMrush?<\/summary>\n<div style=\"margin-top:12px;line-height:1.7;color:#374151;\">\n<p>Ahrefs and SEMrush have significantly larger keyword databases and longer historical data. SearchMind has native AI engine query tracking, AI Overview affect tracking, and conversational query discovery that traditional tools lack. The right answer is usually using both: Ahrefs or SEMrush for database depth, SearchMind or similar for AI-aware layer.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details class=\"faq-item\" style=\"border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:8px;margin:0 0 12px;padding:16px 20px;background:#fff;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:600;cursor:pointer;list-style:none;font-size:1.05em;\">What is the most important AI keyword research insight?<\/summary>\n<div style=\"margin-top:12px;line-height:1.7;color:#374151;\">\n<p>Probably the AI Overview affect status of each keyword. A keyword that loses 50% of click-through to AI Overviews is fundamentally less valuable than a keyword that maintains full click-through, even at the same search volume. Reallocating SEO investment from AI-Overview-affected keywords to AI-Overview-resistant keywords is often the highest-ROI strategic change available in 2026.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details class=\"faq-item\" style=\"border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:8px;margin:0 0 12px;padding:16px 20px;background:#fff;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:600;cursor:pointer;list-style:none;font-size:1.05em;\">How often should I re-do keyword research?<\/summary>\n<div style=\"margin-top:12px;line-height:1.7;color:#374151;\">\n<p>Quarterly for most sites. Annual for stable niches. The AI search landscape is shifting fast enough that 12-month-old keyword research is increasingly stale. Specifically, AI Overview coverage expanded significantly through 2025 and continues to evolve in 2026. Quarterly recalibration catches the shifts.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details class=\"faq-item\" style=\"border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:8px;margin:0 0 12px;padding:16px 20px;background:#fff;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:600;cursor:pointer;list-style:none;font-size:1.05em;\">Should small sites bother with AI keyword research?<\/summary>\n<div style=\"margin-top:12px;line-height:1.7;color:#374151;\">\n<p>Yes, with proportional investment. The free Linkstonic Starter tier covers 10 keywords across 2 AI engines, enough for early validation. The discipline of tracking AI affect status from day one prevents building content strategies on AI-affected keywords that will not produce results.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details class=\"faq-item\" style=\"border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:8px;margin:0 0 12px;padding:16px 20px;background:#fff;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:600;cursor:pointer;list-style:none;font-size:1.05em;\">What\u2019s the difference between Linkstonic SearchMind and Keyword Insights?<\/summary>\n<div style=\"margin-top:12px;line-height:1.7;color:#374151;\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\">Linkstonic SearchMind<\/a> integrates AI keyword research with broader AI visibility tracking and SEO audit in one platform. <a href=\"https:\/\/keywordinsights.ai\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Keyword Insights<\/a> specializes in deeper clustering algorithms without broader SEO infrastructure. Linkstonic suits teams wanting integrated workflow; Keyword Insights suits clustering-first specialists. Different jobs, different price points ($49\/mo vs $58+\/mo).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details class=\"faq-item\" style=\"border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:8px;margin:0 0 12px;padding:16px 20px;background:#fff;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:600;cursor:pointer;list-style:none;font-size:1.05em;\">Can I do AI keyword research for free?<\/summary>\n<div style=\"margin-top:12px;line-height:1.7;color:#374151;\">\n<p>Yes for early-stage operations. Free AI keyword research combines ChatGPT or Claude free tier for conversational query discovery, <a href=\"https:\/\/search.google.com\/search-console\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google Search Console<\/a> for queries already driving impressions, <a href=\"https:\/\/ads.google.com\/home\/tools\/keyword-planner\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google Keyword Planner<\/a> for volume data, and <a href=\"https:\/\/answerthepublic.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">AnswerThePublic<\/a> for question variants. The free stack produces useful results for under 30 priority keywords.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details class=\"faq-item\" style=\"border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:8px;margin:0 0 12px;padding:16px 20px;background:#fff;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:600;cursor:pointer;list-style:none;font-size:1.05em;\">Does conversational query optimization hurt my Google ranking?<\/summary>\n<div style=\"margin-top:12px;line-height:1.7;color:#374151;\">\n<p>No.\u00a0The structural patterns that help conversational query optimization \u2014 direct answer blocks, <a href=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/FAQPage\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">FAQPage schema<\/a>, named examples \u2014 also improve traditional Google ranking. The optimization compounds across both surfaces. The only tradeoff is the upfront time to research conversational query variants alongside traditional keyword research.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n<h2>What should you do for keyword research from zero today?<\/h2>\n<p>Three steps.<\/p>\n<p>Pick 5-10 seed topics that match your business goals. Use ChatGPT or Claude to expand each topic into 30-50 conversational queries buyers might actually ask. This produces a starting query pool of 150-500 candidates.<\/p>\n<p>Run the query pool through SearchMind (or similar AI-aware tool) to surface AI Overview affect status, intent classification, and competitor citation patterns. Drop queries with bad affect status or no commercial intent. Keep 50-100 queries that combine reasonable volume with favorable AI affect.<\/p>\n<p>Add the final 50-100 queries to weekly tracking across Google and at least 2-3 AI engines. Review weekly for 8 weeks. Adjust the tracked set based on actual performance signals (citation gains, citation losses, ranking shifts, competitor moves).<\/p>\n<p>A contrarian observation: most teams over-invest in finding more keywords and under-invest in tracking the ones they already chose. A site tracking 50 keywords carefully across both Google and AI engines outperforms a site tracking 500 keywords carelessly. Depth of attention beats breadth of coverage in keyword research, especially in 2026 when the signal quality matters more than the signal quantity.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AI keyword research in 2026 covers conversational queries, AI engine citations, and intent depth. How AI-native keyword tools differ from Ahrefs and SEMrush.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":49445,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ai-keyword-research-tool.png","fifu_image_alt":"AI Keyword Research Tool: What Actually Changed (and What Did Not) in 2026","footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[31,33,32,35,34],"class_list":["post-1001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ai-seo-use-cases","tag-ai-keyword-discovery","tag-ai-search-keyword-tool","tag-chatgpt-keyword-research","tag-keyword-research-2026","tag-semantic-keyword-ai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1001"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1001\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49477,"href":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1001\/revisions\/49477"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/49445"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/linkstonic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}